It is seen as a route by which:
Of course, the net returns in capital and income will depend on a host of factors. But on the basis that the investment appears to make commercial sense what tax factors should you take into account?
Who or what should purchase the property?
An initial decision needs to be made whether to purchase the property:
There are significant differences in the tax effects of ownership by individuals or a company.
Deciding the best medium will depend on a number of factors.
You are currently trading as a limited company
The personal purchase of new offices or other buildings and the charging of rent for the use of the buildings to your company is very tax efficient from an income tax position as:
Capital gains on the disposal of an asset are generally calculated by deducting the cost of the asset from the proceeds on disposal and reducing this by the annual exemption. Gains are treated as an individual’s top slice of income and generally taxed at 10% and 20% or a combination of the two from 6 April 2016. However gains on residential property continue to be charged at 18% and 28%.
Unfortunately ER is unlikely to be available on the disposal of business premises used by your company where rent is paid. This is due to the restrictions on obtaining the relief on what is known as an ‘associated disposal’. These restrictions include the common situation where a property is currently in personal ownership, but is used in an unquoted company or partnership trade in return for a rent. Under the ER provisions such relief is restricted where rent is paid from 6 April 2008 onwards.
The decision as to who should own a residential property to let is a balancing act depending on overall financial objectives.
The answer will be dependent on the following factors:
If you already run your business through a company it may be more tax efficient to own the property personally as you will be able to make use of your CGT annual exemption (and spouse’s annual exemption if jointly owned) on eventual disposal to reduce the gain.
In contrast, a company can still use indexation allowance to reduce a capital gain. This effectively uplifts the cost of the property by the increase in the Retail Price Index over the period of ownership. Indexation is not available to reduce the gain on the disposal by an individual so in situations where indexation allowance is substantial, this could result in lower gains.
For personally owned property the net rental income will be taxed at your marginal rate of tax, but if you are financing the purchase with a high percentage of bank finance, the income tax bill will be relatively small.
However the government has announced that for rented property with personal ownership the deduction for finance costs will be restricted to basic rate relief from April 2017.
This restriction is to be phased in over a four year period and will impact higher and additional rate taxpayers.
The net rental income will be taxed at the current corporation tax rate of 20%, which is generally lower than for an individual.
Where the purchase is being financed with a high percentage of loan/bank finance, the corporation tax bill will be relatively small.
But there are other factors to consider:
Personal or joint ownership may be the more appropriate route but there are currently significant other advantages of corporate status particularly if you expect that:
If so, the use of a company as a tax shelter for the net rental income can be attractive.
Use of company as a tax shelter
Profits will be taxed at the current corporation tax rate of 20%. This rate applies to trading companies or property investment companies.
Where profits are retained the income may be suffering around half of the equivalent income tax bills. That means there are more funds available to buy more properties in the future.
There are two potential long-term advantages of the corporate route for residential property:
A potentially attractive route is to consider the property investment company as a ‘retirement fund’. If the properties are retained into retirement, it is likely that any initial financing of the purchases of the property has been paid off and there will be a strong income stream. The profits of the company (after paying corporation tax) can be paid out to you and/or your spouse as shareholders.
There have been significant changes to the taxation of dividends and from 6 April 2016:
CGT will be due on the gain on the eventual sale of the shares.
The share route may also be more attractive to the purchaser of the properties rather than buying the properties directly, as they will only have 0.5% stamp duty to pay rather than the potentially higher sums of stamp duty land tax on the property purchases.
SDLT is payable by the purchaser of the property although Land and Buildings Transaction Tax is payable in Scotland.
Where expensive residential property, valued at more than £500,000 is purchased by a 'non natural person', broadly a company, there is a potential charge - the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED).
The ATED is payable by those purchasing and holding their homes through corporate envelopes, such as companies. In addition a higher rate of SDLT of 15% applies to the purchase.
There are exemptions from the higher rate of SDLT and the ATED charge; in particular, property companies letting out residential properties to third parties.
CGT is charged at 28% on disposals of properties liable to ATED and valued at more than £500,000 from 6 April 2016.
This factsheet has concentrated on potentially long-term tax factors to bear in mind.
You need to decide which is the best route to fit in with your objectives. We can help you to plan an appropriate course of action so please do contact us.
For information of users: This material is published for the information of clients. It provides only an overview of the regulations in force at the date of publication, and no action should be taken without consulting the detailed legislation or seeking professional advice. Therefore no responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material can be accepted by the authors or the firm.
Richard is a qualified CIMA accountant with around twenty years’ experience and runs his own accountancy practice in Windsor & Maidenhead. Richard joined The Children’s Heart Federation (CHF) in 2000 where...
The following Cookies are used on this Site. Users who allow all the Cookies will enjoy the best experience and all functionality on the Site will be available to you.
You can choose to disable any of the Cookies by un-ticking the box below but if you do so your experience with the Site is likely to be diminished.
In order to interact with this site.
To help us to measure how users interact with content and pages on the Site so we can make
things better.
To show content from Google Maps.
To show content from YouTube.
To show content from Vimeo.
To share content across multiple platforms.
To view and book events.
To show user avatars and twitter feeds.
To show content from TourMkr.
To interact with Facebook.
To show content from WalkInto.